Really Right Stuff have just published Part Three of a multi-part series of articles I recently penned on how to choose the right Photographic Expedition to Antarctica. If you are considering a future photographic expedition to Antarctica I highly recommend you take a few minutes out of your day to ensure you make the right decisions when you choose your expedition. Arming yourself with the information in this series will ensure you maximise your own photographic opportunities.
My own expedition to Antarctica this November (Antarctica – White Nature) is long sold out; but if you are interested in travelling on a future expedition you can register your interest by dropping me an email. I will not be offering a standard Antarctica Peninsula expedition in 2018 due to my commitment to the Antarctic Emperor Penguin expedition; however, I may have a future offering for November 2019 and will have more details on this expedition early next year.
Photo of the Month October 2017 – Winters Icy Clutches
Arctic, Landscape Photographs, News and Updates, Photographs, Travel PhotographyThe cusp of winter is an incredible time to travel and photograph in the Arctic regions. The sea can freeze over, the sun is low in the sky and there is an ethereal quality to the light that is unmatched by any other season in my experience. This photograph of a winter landscape was taken in March this year on my winter Svalbard expedition (read the trip report). With the sea frozen in around our expedition ship, the sun low in the sky and a gentle low fog hanging in the distance the conditions were absolutely ideal for landscape imagery. This photograph was the result of simply being in the right place at the right time. Taken with the Canon ultra-wide 11-24mm lens I simply stood at the bow of the ship and leaned over to capture the delicious textures of the foreground ice with the wonderful cracks and ice features providing the perfect leading lines up to the distant mountains.
I will be leading a new expedition for Arctic landscapes and winter wildlife to Svalbard in winter this coming March. If you are interested in joining me or would like some additional information please drop me an email for further details. There are now only a few places remaining before the expedition will be sold out.
The Art of Polar Bear Photography
Arctic, News and Updates, Photographs, Travel Photography, Wildlife Photographs, Workshops and ExpeditionsThere are few animals on the planet that inspire and evoke emotion like Usrsus maritimus – the Polar Bear. The worlds largest land predator, the Polar Bear is actually a marine mammal that spends the majority of its life on the frozen sea ice. Living in some of the world’s most remote and inhospitable regions the Polar bear can weigh up to seven hundred kilograms and during lean times it can go without food for up to six months. With the ability to spread its bulk and weight across its massive paws it is capable of walking on ice that would be far to thin to support a human being. It is one Nature’s greatest feats of engineering.
Not only is the Polar Bear at the top of the Arctic food chain it is also one of the most photogenic mammals the world over. Photographers travel from all corners of the globe in search of powerful and evocative images of this endangered and highly threatened mammal. But how do you get great photographs of such a magnificent and increasingly elusive animal and how do you maximise your chances?
I have spent the better part of the last five years photographing Polar bears in the Arctic during both the summer and winter seasons and I want to share what I have learned about photographing this incredible apex predator. We are going to cover a number of different aspects of polar bear photography and look at how can you maximise your chances of capturing a fantastic photograph of this increasingly endangered and rare mammal. Some of what follows is applicable to wildlife photography in general so you can also apply it to other species as well.
Despite what anyone might tell you, there is no best time of the year to photograph Polar Bears as much depends on your capacity to spend time in the field to actually locate them * (see footnote on location selection). Polar bears do not hibernate (although the female will den when she has cubs) and thus they can be photographed year round. However, there are tens of thousands of square kilometres of sea ice and land mass that form the Polar Bears habitat and an increasingly small number of animals actually living there. Assuming you have the good fortune to encounter a ‘photo-friendly’ bear * (see footnote on Photo bears), the time of year you chose to travel to the Arctic will be the deciding factor on the quality of light you can expect to experience. You should absolutely keep in mind that the quality of light you experience when you are making photographs of Polar bears is going to be very decisive factor in the overall quality of your imagery. So you should consider carefully when you choose to travel.
Both summer and winter can produce great Polar bear images, but if you desire the soft pink ethereal light that many photographers crave you will need to travel on the cusp of winter. Conditions are more difficult in winter (it is obviously much colder in the Arctic during winter) but the light can be truly miraculous and frequently brings with it a magic that simply isn’t available to the summer photographer. If you are interested in landscape photography in the Arctic then you have the added benefit of being in the right place at the right time for the best possible light during a winter cusp expedition. Being totally upfront nothing compares to the light you find at winters edges in the Arctic. It is quite simply stunning and breathtaking. If you want to get an idea what a winter expedition can be like be sure to check out the Ghosts of the Arctic video below:
Summer affords twenty-four hour daylight in the Arctic (the midnight sun) which in effect means you can photograph right through the night and double the amount of time you have available to actively search for Polar Bears. The possibility of golden light with the midnight sun draws many photographers to the Arctic in the summer months. Experience has shown me that the light is often softer at night (although the sun never truly sets). Some areas of the Arctic are prone to fog in summer and the combination of midnight sun and fog can create beautiful atmosphere for photography. Along with twenty-four daylight comes the opportunity to spend more time actually searching for bears and if you are travelling to the Arctic for the very first time I generally recommend a summer trip for your first experience. You can get an idea of what a summer expedition is like by watching the Kingdom of the Ice Bear video below:
Autumn and Spring can offer a little bit of both summer and winter light; although you are unlikely to encounter the sublime rosy pinks of winters frosty edges unless you are right on the winter cusp. Of course the middle of winter it is dark the entire time (depending on how far north you venture) so photography is extremely limited at this time. Typically March is my preferred time for winter light in the Arctic; both for Polar bear photography and Arctic landscapes. The sun crests the horizon but remains low in the sky and there is an ethereal quality to the light that is unmatched during any other season. If conditions are good it is not uncommon to have beautiful soft pink light that lasts for hours. With plenty of ice and snow, conditions are at their absolute optimum for both wildlife and landscape photography.
- Foote note 1: The location you choose to travel to in an effort to find and photograph Polar Bears will increase or decrease your chances significantly. Churchill National Park in Canada for example is pretty much guaranteed to net you a polar bear photograph with organised tours run on a daily and weekly basis. But here is the rub: Polar bears in Churchill photographed high up from the safety of a caged tundra buggy lack power, lack emotion and are frankly in the majority shining examples of mediocrity. Backgrounds in Churchill are also often lacklustre and can be quite problematic for the wildlife photographer seeking clean powerful images that rise above the ordinary. I have heard it said that if you want to photograph Polar Bears go to Churchill; but if you want to photograph wild Polar Bears go to Svalbard. I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment. In my experience, nothing comes close to photographing Polar bears in the primordial landscape of Svalbard.
- Foot note 2: Not all bears you encounter will be ‘photo-friendly’. A photo-friendly bear is a bear who either chooses to approach you to satisfy its curiosity, or who otherwise does not immediately wander off once it becomes aware of your presence. On average I have found roughly one in five bears proves to be a ‘photo-bear’.
Robert Capa famously once said: “If a photograph isn’t good enough its because you are not close enough”. These golden words of wisdom fit perfectly for wildlife photographers with one slight alteration. Put simply “If your wildlife photograph isn’t good enough its because you are not low enough.”
Getting low is absolutely key to creating powerful intimate Polar bear photographs. You simply cannot achieve intimacy with your subject if you are standing 12 feet up (or more) on the deck of a high ship or locked up in a caged tundra buggy. You don’t necessarily have to be on the ice with the bear (a dangerous place to be), but you do need to get yourself as low as you possibly can; and the lower the better. It is not uncommon for me to lie on the ice and even half bury my camera and lens in the snow in an effort to get as low as possible. If I am photographing from ship then I am very careful to make sure that the ship I select has very low decks so that I can be as low as possible. Getting low not only affords you eye contact with your subject but it connects the viewer with the subject on a far more personal level. It is the key to a strong photograph.
Before you press the shutter consider which direction the bear is facing and how you are composing the photograph. A wildlife image will almost always be more successful if the animal is facing into the frame, rather than out of the frame. Consider carefully the negative space in the frame and how you frame the animal in the context of its environment. A successful photograph should show a symbiotic relationship between the bear and its habitat.
The feet position of the polar bear has a strong part to play in any feeling of movement that might be conveyed in your photograph. Keep in mind that photography is a still medium and that unlike video we have to give the feeling of movement in our photographs (not an easy thing to do).
It is important to have separation between the feet, but also to have them in an aesthetically pleasing position. High speed motor drive can greatly assist with feet position and it is better to shoot more frames in the field and be able to sort it out later than to just shoot one or two and end up with frames that have less than ideal foot positioning.
Keep in mind that the Polar Bear is one of the most powerful predators on the planet. If you can capture some of this power in your photograph you have far more chance of creating a strong, powerful and emotive photograph. Facial expressions and body position / body language play a large part in conveying a sense of power in an animal. A bear with its head titled slightly sideways is probably going to look curious. A bear with its head point straight on to the photographer with strong eye contact is going to convey much more power. One isn’t necessarily better than the other, but you should know what you are trying to say with your photograph when you click the shutter.
When it comes to ‘frames per second’; frankly, the more the better. Polar Bears often close their eyes as they walk along (or keep them partially closed). They also often look down at the ground so any eye contact opportunities you may get will probably be fleeting. Having a high speed camera gives you more frames to choose from if and when the polar bear makes eye contact with you. It also allows you to choose the best feet position of the bear when you are later editing your photographs. Capturing an image of a Polar bear with eye contact and just the right feet position is not easy.
If you are fortunate enough to encounter more than one Polar bear then look for interaction between them. Polar bears are on the whole solitary animals and interactions between them are fleeting and rare. Should you encounter two or more bears together (a Celebration of Polar Bears) try and capture moments when they interact. These rare moments are usually full of emotion and can make very strong and powerful photographs.
If you have the opportunity to re-position yourself you should consider strongly the direction of light in relation to your subject. Do you want front light, side light or back light? Back light is the hardest to work in from a technical perspective but can also create the most evocative imagery. Back light also often adds an element of mystery to a photograph that significantly increase its impact. I like to try and work with back light as often as I can as I find this sort of light the most dramatic and it often creates the most mystery and interest.
Front lit subjects can appear quite flat and usually this sort of light is preferred purely for documentary purposes. Side light can be extremely effective depending on the time of day and angle of the sun. We don’t always have the luxury of being able to position ourselves to obtain the perfect lighting angle, but it is worth serious consideration should you have the opportunity. When leading expeditions to photograph Polar Bears I aways work very closely with the captain of the ship (or the zodiac driver) to position ourselves for the best possible light in consideration of the bears movement and behaviour. Just a small aside, if you are choosing an expedition to photograph Polar bears make sure the trip is dedicated to photographers and that the leader has significant experience with Polar bears. General tourist trips will not afford you the requirement to position for best light and leaders with little or no experience photographing Polar bears will be more interested in making sure they get a photograph than in ensuring you have the best possible lighting angle. You should also ensure that the ship you choose has very low decks. Avoid ships with very high bows and sides that will prevent you from being able to connect properly with your subject.
In overcast light conditions you have the benefit of natures ‘soft-box and these sort of conditions can produce really beautiful imagery. Overcast light can be exceedingly beautiful and will really bring out the soft and subtle tones in the snow and ice. I tend to try and avoid direct overhead sunlight as it creates extremely hot highlights on the snow and ice and usually the overall contrast level is too harsh.
It is always worth taking a moment to consider your composition before you start firing the cameras shutter. Take a moment and take a deep breath (you will be very excited if it is your first Polar bear). Look around carefully and try and predict where the bear is going to be for the ideal photograph. Madly firing the shutter without consideration of the composition and story is going to result in nothing more than hundreds of documentary images. Often a few moments consideration of the conditions and landscape before you compose and press the shutter can dramatically improve a photograph.
Lens selection plays a huge role in the overall look of your Polar bear photograph. A long telephoto lens is going to compress the distance between you and the bear and the bear and its background. This sort of lens can be used to great effect to not only create the illusion of bringing the subject closer to the photographer and subsequently the viewer, but also to throw the background way out of focus to help isolate the subject. You do have to be careful to avoid creating photographs that look as though they were taken in a zoo; but used carefully and with due consideration to the background a telephoto lens can be used to great effect.
Wide angle lenses can be used to convey a strong sense of environment in your photography. It is worth remembering that no one wants to travel to the Arctic in search of Polar Bears and come back with photographs that look like they were taken in a zoo. Wide angle lenses will allow you to place the bear in context and show the subject in its environment. A sense of environment can add a great deal of life, emotion and context to a photograph and its importance should not be underestimated. Look carefully at the landscape the bear is moving across. Are there graphical elements in the landscape you can use to help frame your photograph? A leading line of ice for example can be used to great effect. Using the landscape to help frame your image can really add significant impact and balance to the final photograph. Simple imagery that utilises geometric shape and line will almost always result in a strong photograph.
Typically you will want to reach for a long telephoto lens first to capture photographs of the bear at a distance. If you are fortunate to have the bear approach you can then switch to wide angle. I like too work with two cameras at the same time; one with a telephoto lens and one with a wide angle. This way I can quickly switch between them without having to change lenses.
Try and keep in mind that a successful photograph is going to be one that conveys the story of the Polar bear. The world really doesn’t need another head and shoulders shot of a Polar bear. The aim is to try and tell the animals story with your photographs, rather than simply documenting for the sake of it.
Lastly, remember to put the camera down and drink in the experience of being in the vicinity of the world’s largest land-based predator. Polar bears are incredible animals and moments shared with them are extremely special.
Photo of the Month September 2017 – The Bears Paw
Arctic, News and Updates, Photographs, Travel Photography, Wildlife PhotographsThis photograph from winter in Svalbard this year is my photograph of the month for September 2017. I actually wanted to post this last month but was saving it up for the 2017 APPA awards so that the judges would see it with fresh eyes. What makes this photograph work so well is the body language and position of the bear in relation to the snow drift, the quality of the light and of course that wonderful gesture of the dragging paw all crusted in ice. Winter in Svalbard is often best time of the year in my experience for Polar Bear photography as you have optimum light conditions. With the sun low in the sky this sort of rosy pink glow is only found on the very cusp of winter.
I will be leading a new expedition for Polar bears and arctic landscapes to Svalbard in winter this coming March. If you are interested in joining me or would like some additional information please drop me an email for further details. There are now only a few places remaining before the expedition will be sold out.
AIPP Journal Issue #255 Features – The Toughest Print
Arctic, Landscape Photographs, Media, News and Updates, Photographs, Travel Photography, Wildlife PhotographsThe latest September issue of the Australian Institute of Professional Photography (AIPP) Journal features an article I recently penned titled ‘The Toughest Print’. The article was also recently featured on the Luminous Landscape website. You can download a copy of the article by clicking on the image below (you do need to be a full AIPP member to download the complete issue).
Departing for Greenland Expeditions 2017
Arctic, Landscape Photographs, News and Updates, Photographs, Travel Photography, Workshops and ExpeditionsTime has rolled around all too quickly (I feel as though my feet have not touched the ground in Australia) and as soon as I finish this post I am heading back to the airport to start to the long trek to Iceland and then onto Greenland for my two back-to-back expeditions to the east coast and the spectacular Scoresby Sund fjord system. I have been looking forward to returning to the east coast as it has been a few years now since I last visited Greenland. It will be interesting to see how the area has changed and in what sort of state of disrepair the glaciers are now in. With more water melting off the Greenland icecap in a day than France uses in an entire year I am expecting to see some significant change.
As is my custom I like to do a packing list of what photographic equipment I am taking with me. Although these are primarily landscape expeditions we will also be doing quite a lot of photography from zodiac (the east coast of Greenland is home to some of the worlds most dramatic icebergs) and as such I am taking equipment for both the tripod and hand-held work. I am packing my Really Right Stuff Tripod with the new Arca Swiss D4 geared head as well as a full set of LEE filters for land-based work and a couple of Canon EOS 1DX MKII cameras for zodiac work. I am also packing my 300mm F2.8L IS MKII lens in case of any wildlife encounters.
Lightroom Roller (Carry on Luggage)
There is one other important piece of documentation I will be taking with me on this expedition and that is an Australian Customs Declaration form. If you are travelling internationally from Australia you can read about the benefit arming yourself with this documentation HERE.
I am fortunate to meet and travel with some fabulous people who are not only talented photographers in their own right but also a source of continual inspiration. Many of these participants have become friends (and there are quite a few across these two Greenland expeditions) and I just want to take a moment to acknowledge their photography and thank them for their participation and input.
See you in Greenland!
P.S For those of you who have contacted me asking if I will be running a future expedition to the East Coast of Greenland: The answer is not in 2018 – but I have now confirmed a charter for 2019 and will have more details later this year.
Australian Geographic Feature Awarded APPA 2017 Photographs
Arctic, Media, News and Updates, Travel Photography, Wildlife PhotographsAustralian Geographic Magazine has just featured nine of their favourite photographs from the recent 2017 AIPP Australian Professional Photography Awards. The Australian Institute of Professional Photography (AIPP) has announced the 2017 winners of its prestigious annual photography awards. Both Australian and international photographers competed across 24 categories, including travel, landscape, animals, science and people. Here are our favourites of the stunning award-winning shots.
Journey Weaver Magazine August 2017 Feature – The Ice Whisperer
Antarctica, Arctic, Landscape Photographs, Media, News and Updates, Photographs, Travel PhotographyInternational magazine, Journey Weaver, has just published new interview “The Ice Whisperer” in their latest issue (catchy title!). “Multi-award winning Arctic photographer Joshua Holko knows a thing or two about shooting captivating images of rare wildlife in extreme conditions. He speaks with Crystal Leung about the shot that won him Global Arctic Photographer of the Year, polar travel essentials and his love affair for the world’s coolest destinations.” Just click on the image below to download the full PDF. 
APPA 2017 – Analysis of the Print Score
Arctic, News and Updates, Travel Photography, Wildlife PhotographsYesterday I received a number of very supportive messages in response to my WR-APPA post where I summarised my 2017 APPA results and very gingerly dipped my toe into the murky waters of the APPA scoring ‘game’. In response to those messages, which were universal in they’re questioning of why two of my prints did not score Gold awards I have decided to wade further into those dangerous APPA waters with a more in-depth analysis of one of my print scores. In particular, this photograph of a Polar bear which seems to be the one most people have singled out as being short changed of a Gold award.
Before we analyse the reasons behind the prints final Silver Distinction award lets agree that this exercise is purely for the benefit of those who want to better understand why a print scores what it does. As previously noted, I am comfortable with the final score and at the risk of repeating myself I do feel that the panel of five judges did, on the whole, do justice to all of my prints. With that caveat crystal clear lets begin.
Firstly, lets look at the overall scoring process so that everyone has a good understanding of the overall APPA mechanics. In brief, the panel of five judges are scoring prints out of 100 under strictly controlled lighting conditions. The judges scores are then averaged to give a final overall score out of 100. Prints of a professional standard that score between 75 and 79 points are not considered of award standard but are considered to be a good example of solid professional practice. Prints between 80 and 84 are considered examples of photographs above professional practice and worthy of recognition and are subsequently classed as a Silver Award. Prints between 85 and 89 are of exceptional standard and are awarded with a Silver with Distinction. Prints judged 90 – 94 and 95 – 100 are Gold and Gold with Distinction awards respectively that are reserved for prints that are considered to be of the highest calibre. Judges are often heard to wax lyrical about a Gold award print needing to be one that is never forgotten. It takes a print of exceptional quality to be awarded with a Silver or Gold award.
In this instance the panel of five judges scored the print 83, 84, 87, 87 and 87. One of the judges was in the solid silver range on 83, whilst another was on the fence of Silver or Silver Distinction at 84 and the remaining three judges were all on 87 or a solid Silver with Distinction. The scores are added together and then divided by five to give us a final average of 86 – A silver with Distinction.
Now, had one of the judges been five or more points away from the average score of 86 they could have elected to challenge (see footnote 1) the print score and a short debate would have ensued whereby a number of judges would be invited by the panel chair to present their thoughts and arguments on why the print should either score more, or remain the same (it is very rare for a print to be talked down in score). Likewise, if one of the judges had scored it 90 or more (or if one of the judges had been more than ten points away from the average) there would have been an automatic challenge and the debate would have ensued as above. After the debate the print would have been re-scored. Had this occurred the print may have moved up in points and possibly into a Gold Award. Or, it may have remained at 86, a Silver with Distinction.
Now, as it stands none of the judges scored the print 90+ and we can only second guess ourselves as to why (speculating on a judges motives would be a very slippery slope). Additionally, none of the judges were five points or more away from the average and thus there was no opportunity to challenge to improve the score. If, as in this case, the judges are all within five points of the average, the initial average score of 86 will stand with no further option to re-score (the only exception to this is a print on the cusp of the next award level that will then go for review at the end of the judging session). As an entrant, that is the pitfall of consistent judge scoring at APPA; you loose the possibility of a challenge.
Now, one could argue that consistent scoring at APPA is a good thing and this is a perfectly rational and logical position to adopt. Such scoring shows consistency across the judging panel and ‘perhaps’ indicates that the judges are very close to the ‘right’ score. In reality, the only thing it represents for certain is that the judges more or less subjectively agree with each other. The problem with consistent scoring is it does rob the entrant of any chance of real debate and the chance for the print to be re-scored. And that is where a ‘spike’ judge can really benefit an entrant. A ‘spike’ judge is quite literally a judge who tends to score five points or more outside of the average more often than would be considered ‘normal’. The ‘spike’ benefits the entrant by potentially creating a five point difference and triggering a challenge and subsequent debate and re-score. This did not occur in my case. Nor did it occur for my print that scored an average of 88 (another Silver with Distinction with all judges within five points of each other). In fact, the judges were within five points of each other across all four of my prints!
In situations where there is no option to challenge (as in this case) one of the judges is invited to comment on the print by the panel chairperson for the benefit of the entrant. In this case the comment was as follows:
“ Yeah… very interesting picture. It’s not the sort of thing you often see. And the caption describes it perfectly too; the dragging of the foot. I was just drawn to the contrast between the chunkiness and the detail on the foot and then this little bit facial expression. Lovely subtle tones as well. Well done to the photographer.”
What you choose to individually read into the judges comment above is totally subjective. For me, it was quite gratifying as the judge in question acknowledged exactly what this print is about. When I chose this print for my APPA entries I did so because I felt it presented a very unique view of a Polar bear very few people would have ever seen. I also felt the soft and subtle pastel tones of winter light perfectly complimented the fur of the bear and that the overall gesture of the bear carried both a power and delicacy that had strong emotional impact. Whilst the language used in the judges comment is a little clumsy they did at least ‘get it’ and thus it is clear the intention behind the comment was very positive.
With the comment made and the average score of 86 locked in the print was awarded its Silver with Distinction before the next print was turned around and judged with fresh eyes. And that is exactly how a print that you might feel worthy of a Gold Award ends up with a Silver with Distinction. Without that trigger of a challenge there is no possibility of a debate and the subsequent re-score that would follow. You are instead locked into the first and only averaged score. It happens all the time and it is just a fact of life in the APPA game.
__
Footnote 1: Challenges are issued when one of the judges (who is either in Gold on 90 or above; or is more than five points away from the average) wants to see the print finish with a higher score. This is known as “championing the print”. A great many prints finish in the Gold scoring range through this process. Very few prints score Gold outright without a challenge; although it does happen on occasion.
Thats a WR-APPA! AIPP Australian Professional Photography Awards 2017 Complete
Antarctica, Arctic, Media, News and Updates, Photographs, Travel Photography, Wildlife PhotographsThis past weekend saw the annual running of the Australian Professional Photography Awards; affectionately known to all who enter as the APPA’s. I have blogged before quite extensively on the APPA awards and the APPA award system so I wont repeat myself again here (If you are interested you can do a quick search on my blog). I will simply add that the APPA awards are very near and dear to my heart as the only professional print awards in Australia for working professional photographers. Yes, the majority of the work entered is not representative of what most working professional photographers do on a daily basis, but that isn’t the point of APPA.
The APPA awards is an event (run across three days) of heavenly highs and abyssal lows. It can be incredibly uplifting and utterly soul destroying all in a matter of mere moments. There are audible whoops of joy from entrants in the APPA corridors and simultaneous streams of tears from other judging rooms. I have myself had a print score a lofty 98 Gold with Distinction at state level only to have it crash to an 81 Silver Award at Nationals. Its a sobering reality to have your work fall so far short of your hopes and dreams; but it happens to all of us at some point. Fortunately for me I went on that year to win the overall category with two more Gold images and another Silver with Distinction. The key to staying mentally stable at APPA and not working yourself into a twisted knot of anxiety is too simply accept your scores for what they are: The average of five different judges opinions on a given day. You have to accept that judging photographs (be it prints or digital files) is utterly subjective and whilst we as judges look for all sorts of different technical merit in a print that can be quantified, we are also looking for creativity and the vagaries of emotional content. And that magical, elusive and mystical element rarely speaks to the panel of judges simultaneously.
I have been entering for some years now and chose again this year to enter my four prints into the Science, Wildlife and Wild Places category. The four photographs I decided to enter were relatively recent captures and had not been entered at State level for ‘testing’. I decided to take a gamble, back my gut instinct and simply enter the images untested (You have to have the courage of your convictions at APPA). As it turned out my gamble paid off with all four prints scoring Silver with Distinction Awards. This is an absolutely fantastic result that I am extremely pleased with. Subsequently, I was asked by one entrant at the awards dinner last night if I was disappointed at not receiving Gold for two of the images that this person felt were of absolutely the highest Gold standard (I did very much appreciate the compliment). I had to take a moment to consider my feelings on the matter before I responded. Now, with the passage of a little more time I have had more of a chance to consider how I feel about this. And, yes, of course I wish the images had received Gold Awards (I certainly felt they met all the criteria!) but that isn’t at the heart of why I participate in the APPA awards and being disappointed about not getting Gold awards would be missing the point of entry. You also have to keep in mind that the difference between a Gold and Silver with Distinction can be as little as one point!
Wether you are a judge or an entrant (or both as in my case) you have to keep an open mind to critique and comment (good, bad and indifferent). And you absolutely have to maintain a degree of mutual respect for your fellow entrants and the panel of judges. I will admit that it is not easy to accept a print score you disagree with when you have sweated bullets over the final print but there is almost always something positive you can take away from the result and quite honestly that is how I feel about my own print scores this year. Even though I feel two of them should have got up for Gold awards I feel satisfied that the panel of judges I had on the day did overall, do justice to my prints. After all, they scored not only in the Silver Distinction award range, but fell just short of Gold and that very small difference is nothing more than a few points in total across the average of the five judges scores on the given day. Once you accept the decision from the panel and realise its just a point score average you free yourself from any potential disappointment. Take on board any constructive critique and you may find ways improve your work even further. And that is the key to improving your photography at APPA.